Mayoi Neko Overrun! [Doki] (1280x720 H264 BD AAC)
Please enable Javascript
If you don't want to you can still view the description.
In case you're using NoScript or similar Javascript blocking software allow:
http://www.bakabt.me/ and http://ajax.googleapis.com/
| Type: | |
| Size: | 5.64 GB (6,057,100,343) bytes |
| Completed: | 1985 time(s) |
| per Day: | 4.487 |
| Snatches: | 4332 |
| per Day: | 9.793 |
| Added: | 12:43 pm on March 8th 2011 |
| Ratio after Downloading: | N/A |
| Peers: | 31 peers - 28 seeders - 3 leechers |
| Last Activity: | < 1 min |
| Last seed: | < 1 min |
| Uploaded by: |
Jecht |
Last edited: 1 year and 2 months and 3 days
| DL | Type | Filename | Size |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mayoi Neko Overrun! [Doki] (1280x720 H264 BD AAC).sfv | 1.86 KB |
datora
March 8th 2011 (1 year and 2 months and 16 days)
.
Agreed. Cool description, but sample screenies are coming up about 910 x 510 pixels. Assume the actual videos are true 1280 x 720 ..?
Oh, and also assume it is intended to replace http://www.bakabt.com/153596-mayoi-neko-overrun-stray-cat-overrun-nuke.html ..? What's the advantages?
[ EDIT: 'Kay. Thanks for responses, guys! ]
V
Agreed. Cool description, but sample screenies are coming up about 910 x 510 pixels. Assume the actual videos are true 1280 x 720 ..?
Oh, and also assume it is intended to replace http://www.bakabt.com/153596-mayoi-neko-overrun-stray-cat-overrun-nuke.html ..? What's the advantages?
[ EDIT: 'Kay. Thanks for responses, guys! ]
V
Echion
March 8th 2011 (1 year and 2 months and 16 days)
The screens are 1280x720 actually. They only show in lower res but if you right click and 'view image' on them you'll see the full size.
Blitzz
March 8th 2011 (1 year and 2 months and 16 days)
Datora i believe nukes source is from the TV while this is ripped from BD, it also contains the specials
Southrop (Cardinal Directions Womanizer - Moderator)
March 8th 2011 (1 year and 2 months and 16 days)
Dunno if it's just me, but your zoom code doesn't seem to work. Win 7 HomePre 64bit on Chrome for reference.
mega_tjockis
March 8th 2011 (1 year and 2 months and 16 days)» Southrop
Dunno if it's just me, but your zoom code doesn't seem to work. Win 7 HomePre 64bit on Chrome for reference.works fine for me same spec win7 64bit chrome
beeyacht (Magical Uploader)
March 8th 2011 (1 year and 2 months and 16 days)» Southrop
Dunno if it's just me, but your zoom code doesn't seem to work. Win 7 HomePre 64bit on Chrome for reference.Same, and also is impossible to display at original resolution. Switching to the built-in lightbox won't be too hard.
Al_Sleeper (Mr. "Never Satisfied")
March 8th 2011 (1 year and 2 months and 16 days)
Zoom doesn't work either. WinXP SP3 32bit + Firefox v.3.6.15.
However, opening them through right click menu works properly.
However, opening them through right click menu works properly.
ijshorn
March 8th 2011 (1 year and 2 months and 16 days)
works for my (windows 7 64bit home , firefox)
Enzedder (Adult Arbiter - Moderator)
March 8th 2011 (1 year and 2 months and 16 days)
Ah yes. The zoom does not work however the screenshots are actually there. I would probably vote for removing zoom feature as well though it is nice. (I didn't pick it up because Opera doesn't run the scripting and I have a feature which displays the full image on hover with all its information. >_<)
You may wish to change:
allowHeightReduction : true,
and
allowSizeReduction: true,
to false.
That might solve the problem though I am not entirely sure since its a f*** ton of code.
You may wish to change:
allowHeightReduction : true,
and
allowSizeReduction: true,
to false.
That might solve the problem though I am not entirely sure since its a f*** ton of code.
BlueUltimate
March 9th 2011 (1 year and 2 months and 15 days)
Wait what Specials I never heard of this!!!
Must downlaod NOW
Must downlaod NOW
raiqem
March 10th 2011 (1 year and 2 months and 14 days)
The anime starts great...but then the story kind of starts to derail off the tracks and the ending is not really an ending. Will there be a second season ?
Ichigo69
March 10th 2011 (1 year and 2 months and 13 days)
um, I think I'm a bit late to the party b/c it's already been accepted, but the category section has both seinen /and/ shounen. This is kinda unpossible. The only magazine the manga has been serialised in is Jump SQ, which is a shounen magazine. Please remove the seinen category. ^__^
PaterFrog
March 12th 2011 (1 year and 2 months and 12 days)
You're missing the ANN link: http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/encyclopedia/anime.php?id=11175
The reason I would add it is because many people always rate anime on the same site, so there is a certain consitency in it.
I'd know what to expect if something has, say, 60% people rating above 5 out of 10 on ANN, while I'd have no understanding what the same score could mean on another web site.
This has nothing to do with people liking or disliking the services of certain pages.
The reason I would add it is because many people always rate anime on the same site, so there is a certain consitency in it.
I'd know what to expect if something has, say, 60% people rating above 5 out of 10 on ANN, while I'd have no understanding what the same score could mean on another web site.
This has nothing to do with people liking or disliking the services of certain pages.
BlazerSoul (Mr. Poopyhead)
March 12th 2011 (1 year and 2 months and 12 days)
Including an ANN link is not a requirement for descriptions, unlike A-P. All for all, ANN/MAL/AniDB ratings tend to suck a lot, and you might already be missing a lot of good anime just because it didn't rank quite well.
datora
March 24th 2011 (1 year and 2 months and 10 hours)
.
Got around to watching it this week & finished a few minutes ago. Sorry to say I've got buyer's remorse on this one. Yah, the animation is pretty, as would be expected of recent offerings. Nice little bit ecchi throughout. By Ep. 3 I thought it was getting its feet and staged to turn into something interesting, but ... meh. Turned into a jumble of incomprehensible plotless junkettes that were shallow vehicles for fanservice and jokes. Few laughs sprinkled about, but not overly clever. Character development wasn't. Duex ex Machina Overrun! might have been a better title.
Could go for an 8 on animation & style ... it's about par for modern anime and looks all candy compared to ten years ago, but plot & character development struggles to achieve maybe 4-ish.
Apprec the offer & upload effort. Thank you, really. But once I hit my personal seed goals on it, this is one of the very few animes that I expect to delete (maybe #3 or 4 in two years).
Got around to watching it this week & finished a few minutes ago. Sorry to say I've got buyer's remorse on this one. Yah, the animation is pretty, as would be expected of recent offerings. Nice little bit ecchi throughout. By Ep. 3 I thought it was getting its feet and staged to turn into something interesting, but ... meh. Turned into a jumble of incomprehensible plotless junkettes that were shallow vehicles for fanservice and jokes. Few laughs sprinkled about, but not overly clever. Character development wasn't. Duex ex Machina Overrun! might have been a better title.
Could go for an 8 on animation & style ... it's about par for modern anime and looks all candy compared to ten years ago, but plot & character development struggles to achieve maybe 4-ish.
Apprec the offer & upload effort. Thank you, really. But once I hit my personal seed goals on it, this is one of the very few animes that I expect to delete (maybe #3 or 4 in two years).
Tjoohej
March 30th 2011 (1 year and 1 month and 25 days)
I LOVE YOU BBT, it never ends, more and more awesome animes keeps comping upp like everyday. my social life will go kabom if this keeps up
BlueUltimate
March 31st 2011 (1 year and 1 month and 24 days)» datora
.Agreed. Cool description, but sample screenies are coming up about 910 x 510 pixels. Assume the actual videos are true 1280 x 720 ..?
Oh, and also assume it is intended to replace http://www.bakabt.com/153596-mayoi-neko-overrun-stray-cat-overrun-nuke.html ..? What's the advantages?
[ EDIT: 'Kay. Thanks for responses, guys! ]
V
Yeah I just saw some of the eps, and compared it with Nuke's.
And Nuke's subs are more enjoyable to watch, especially when it comes to editing and placing of the subs.
Nuke also seems to sub some small signs and things that Doki didn't sub.
Better of only getting this for the specials and maybe the higher image quality but thats all. Personally Nuke subs are more enjoyable to watch.
werner-kun
February 28th 2012 (2 months and 24 days)» datora
Got around to watching it this week & finished a few minutes ago. Sorry to say I've got buyer's remorse on this one. Yah, the animation is pretty, as would be expected of recent offerings. Nice little bit ecchi throughout. By Ep. 3 I thought it was getting its feet and staged to turn into something interesting, but ... meh. Turned into a jumble of incomprehensible plotless junkettes that were shallow vehicles for fanservice and jokes. Few laughs sprinkled about, but not overly clever. Character development wasn't. You kinda missed that this anime is first and foremost a comedy, secondly a parody and then a harem, maybe somewhere in horizon one can see a random glimpse of actual drama.
Submitting
Tatsujin
March 8th 2011 (1 year and 2 months and 16 days)